President Donald Trump announced that the United States had "obliterated" three of Iran’s most critical nuclear facilities in a dramatic escalation of tensions in the Middle East. “The bully of the Middle East must now make peace,” Trump said during his Saturday night address from the White House.
The US strikes reportedly targeted nuclear enrichment sites at Fordow, Natanz, and Isfahan. B-2 stealth bombers carrying GBU-57 “bunker buster” bombs were deployed in the assault, aimed specifically at fortified underground facilities. “There will either be peace or there will be tragedy for Iran,” Trump warned, adding that if peace did not follow, further strikes would be carried out “with precision, speed and skill.”
While Trump declared the mission a success, describing the targets as “completely and totally obliterated,” Iran downplayed the damage. Hassan Abedini, an Iranian state media official, said key materials had been evacuated from the sites in advance. The Atomic Energy Organization of Iran condemned the attack as a “barbaric violation” of international law.
Iran’s foreign minister Abbas Araghchi promised consequences. “In accordance with the UN Charter… Iran reserves all options to defend its sovereignty, interest, and people,” he said. Moments later, Iran launched missiles toward Israeli cities.
Tehran’s dilemma: Retaliate or recalculate?
Experts say Iran now faces two stark options. Jonathan Panikoff of the Atlantic Council laid out Tehran’s potential paths: “Iran can choose to strike US bases in a limited fashion… or it could go all in and trigger a regional war,” he warned.
Doing nothing could spare Iran further military damage but risks making the regime appear weak, potentially undermining its hold on power. “If we do not react, the US will not leave us alone,” said conservative Tehran analyst Reza Salehi.
A measured response—such as attacking symbolic US positions—might satisfy hardliners without triggering full-scale war. Yet, many believe Trump’s threats and the severity of the strikes make such restraint unlikely. “Hardliners in the Iranian regime may ultimately win the day,” Panikoff added, warning that asymmetric attacks or terror operations abroad remain on the table.
Iran’s history of striking back—such as the Khobar Towers bombing or rocket attacks on US troops in Iraq—suggests it has the capability and willingness to retaliate, as per the New York Times. Its allies, such as the Houthis in Yemen, have already vowed to target US naval forces in the Red Sea if the conflict escalates.
Escalating stakes for the region
The US has a massive presence across the Middle East, with more than 40,000 troops spread over 19 sites, including major installations in Bahrain, Qatar, and Iraq. Many of these bases—like Al-Udeid in Qatar and Al-Asad in Iraq—are within reach of Iranian missiles.
Iran’s former Revolutionary Guard commander, Gen. Mohsen Rezaei, warned just before the strike that if Trump entered the conflict, Iran would strike American military assets, mine the Persian Gulf, and attempt to shut the Strait of Hormuz—a critical oil route through which nearly 30% of the world’s oil flows.
Washington has responded by reinforcing its regional defences. Secretary of Defence Pete Hegseth confirmed the deployment of additional assets to protect US interests, and diplomatic missions have been partially evacuated in anticipation of reprisals.
But Iran’s options remain limited. Its missile range does not extend to US soil, and its air force lacks the capability to project power beyond the region. This makes local US bases and regional allies the most likely targets.
An uncertain road ahead
The Iranian leadership appears divided. Two senior officials indicated that prior to the strike, there had been hope in Tehran that Trump could be dissuaded by domestic and international pressure. Abbas Araghchi had engaged in diplomacy in Istanbul and with European leaders to avoid direct US engagement. But those efforts failed.
Iran now finds itself in a high-stakes dilemma. A strong response could invite further US strikes and risk collapse; a weak one could damage the regime’s credibility and influence in the region. Either way, Tehran’s decision in the coming days may determine not only its future, but the shape of the Middle East for years to come.
As Trump warned, “Remember, there are many targets left.”
The US strikes reportedly targeted nuclear enrichment sites at Fordow, Natanz, and Isfahan. B-2 stealth bombers carrying GBU-57 “bunker buster” bombs were deployed in the assault, aimed specifically at fortified underground facilities. “There will either be peace or there will be tragedy for Iran,” Trump warned, adding that if peace did not follow, further strikes would be carried out “with precision, speed and skill.”
While Trump declared the mission a success, describing the targets as “completely and totally obliterated,” Iran downplayed the damage. Hassan Abedini, an Iranian state media official, said key materials had been evacuated from the sites in advance. The Atomic Energy Organization of Iran condemned the attack as a “barbaric violation” of international law.
Iran’s foreign minister Abbas Araghchi promised consequences. “In accordance with the UN Charter… Iran reserves all options to defend its sovereignty, interest, and people,” he said. Moments later, Iran launched missiles toward Israeli cities.
Tehran’s dilemma: Retaliate or recalculate?
Experts say Iran now faces two stark options. Jonathan Panikoff of the Atlantic Council laid out Tehran’s potential paths: “Iran can choose to strike US bases in a limited fashion… or it could go all in and trigger a regional war,” he warned.
Doing nothing could spare Iran further military damage but risks making the regime appear weak, potentially undermining its hold on power. “If we do not react, the US will not leave us alone,” said conservative Tehran analyst Reza Salehi.
A measured response—such as attacking symbolic US positions—might satisfy hardliners without triggering full-scale war. Yet, many believe Trump’s threats and the severity of the strikes make such restraint unlikely. “Hardliners in the Iranian regime may ultimately win the day,” Panikoff added, warning that asymmetric attacks or terror operations abroad remain on the table.
Iran’s history of striking back—such as the Khobar Towers bombing or rocket attacks on US troops in Iraq—suggests it has the capability and willingness to retaliate, as per the New York Times. Its allies, such as the Houthis in Yemen, have already vowed to target US naval forces in the Red Sea if the conflict escalates.
Escalating stakes for the region
The US has a massive presence across the Middle East, with more than 40,000 troops spread over 19 sites, including major installations in Bahrain, Qatar, and Iraq. Many of these bases—like Al-Udeid in Qatar and Al-Asad in Iraq—are within reach of Iranian missiles.
Iran’s former Revolutionary Guard commander, Gen. Mohsen Rezaei, warned just before the strike that if Trump entered the conflict, Iran would strike American military assets, mine the Persian Gulf, and attempt to shut the Strait of Hormuz—a critical oil route through which nearly 30% of the world’s oil flows.
Washington has responded by reinforcing its regional defences. Secretary of Defence Pete Hegseth confirmed the deployment of additional assets to protect US interests, and diplomatic missions have been partially evacuated in anticipation of reprisals.
But Iran’s options remain limited. Its missile range does not extend to US soil, and its air force lacks the capability to project power beyond the region. This makes local US bases and regional allies the most likely targets.
An uncertain road ahead
The Iranian leadership appears divided. Two senior officials indicated that prior to the strike, there had been hope in Tehran that Trump could be dissuaded by domestic and international pressure. Abbas Araghchi had engaged in diplomacy in Istanbul and with European leaders to avoid direct US engagement. But those efforts failed.
Iran now finds itself in a high-stakes dilemma. A strong response could invite further US strikes and risk collapse; a weak one could damage the regime’s credibility and influence in the region. Either way, Tehran’s decision in the coming days may determine not only its future, but the shape of the Middle East for years to come.
As Trump warned, “Remember, there are many targets left.”
You may also like
Period drama based on beloved book branded 'perfect for Austen fans'
'Underrated' Stephen King book fans call his 'best'
Star Trek icon's horrific WW2 injury - and how he hid it on sci-fi set
I went to Tenerife for the first time - there's 1 thing I don't understand
Terrifying moment woman was catapulted from UK fairground ride at 60mph
